Skip to main content

ACCC acts on Froothie Australia, online juicer and blender retailer

ACCC acts on alleged false or misleading strike through pricing by Froothie Australia


Here is the link to the original article published by the ACC

https://www.accc.gov.au/media-release/accc-acts-on-alleged-false-or-misleading-strike-through-pricing-by-froothie-australia


17 December 2015
Athena Solutions Pty Ltd trading as Froothie Australia (Froothie), the supplier of Optimum branded kitchen appliances, has paid a penalty of $10,800 following the issue of an infringement notice by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. Froothie supplies Optimum branded domestic and commercial kitchen appliances such as blenders and juicers on the Froothie website.
The ACCC issued the infringement notice to Froothie because it had reasonable grounds to believe that Froothie made a false or misleading representation that consumers would obtain a saving if they purchased the Optimum 9400 blender, when this was not the case.
From at least 7 August 2015 to 23 October 2015, Froothie advertised the Optimum 9400 blender on the Froothie website (http://www.froothie.com.au/) with the statement:
  • “PROMO PRICE : $579.00”
directly below the strike through price statement
  • “PRICE : $691.00”
Froothie was unable to show that the Optimum 9400 blender had been offered for sale, or sold, at the strike through price of $691.00 prior to the representation being made on the website.
Accordingly, the ACCC believed that Froothie had falsely represented that a consumer who purchased the Optimum 9400 blender would obtain a discount of $112.00, being the difference between the strike through price and the “Promo Price” when, in fact, the Optimum 9400 blender had not been offered for sale at the strike through price on the Froothie website for a reasonable period, if at all, prior to that representation being made.
“Consumers may rely on two-price comparison advertising when trying to find the best deal available. If there are no genuine savings, then businesses are misleading consumers. Businesses should be able to substantiate any representation made to consumers as accurate or risk enforcement action by the ACCC” ACCC Commissioner Sarah Court said.
“False or misleading pricing not only misleads consumers, but can also disadvantage competing retailers making accurate pricing statements.”
“In the lead up to the Christmas and new year sales period, businesses should ensure that advertised savings are genuine and are not false or misleading.”
The payment of a penalty specified in an infringement notice is not an admission of a contravention of the Australian Consumer Law. The ACCC can issue an infringement notice where it has reasonable grounds to believe a person has contravened certain consumer protection laws.
Screenshot of Froothie advertising

Release number: 
MR 264/15
ACCC Infocentre: 
Use this form to make a general enquiry.
Media enquiries: 
Media team - 1300 138 917

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Misleading "strike- through" price" Infringement notice - Froothie

The supplier of commercial kitchen appliances, Athena Solutions Pty Ltd trading as Froothie Australia ( Froothie ), has paid a $10,800 penalty after receiving an infringement notice from the ACCC. Froothie falsely represented to consumers that they were obtaining a discount when purchasing a blender, by using a strike through price statement. However, in fact, the blender had not been offered for sale at the higher price, prior to that representation being made. Extract from http://www.conventuslaw.com/report/australia-quarterly-consumer-law-update/
Post a Comment
Read more

Optimum 9400 blender false claim of consumer savings, ACCC fines Froothie

Extract from AER.gov.au Infringement notices The following infringement notices were paid in 2015–16. Table 3.45: Small business infringement notices paid Athena Solutions Pty Ltd t/a Froothie Australia 14 December 2015 One notice of $10 800 The ACCC issued the infringement notice to Froothie because it had reasonable grounds to believe that Froothie made a false or misleading representation that consumers would obtain a saving if they purchased the Optimum 9400 blender when this was not the case.
Post a Comment
Read more

MISLEADING OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT by Froothie, Optimum

Extract from www.allens.com.au MISLEADING OR DECEPTIVE CONDUCT: PRICING IN THE ONLINE SPACE – KOGAN/FROOTHIE The ACCC recently issued infringement notices against Athena Solutions Pty Ltd trading as Froothie Australia and Kogan.com Pty Ltd for alleged false or misleading advertising in the online retail space. Froothie received an infringement notice after advertising a blender on its website at a 'promo price', which was shown immediately below a strike-through price statement. The ACCC had reasonable grounds to believe that this constituted a false or misleading representation (thereby entitling the ACCC to issue an infringement notice), as Froothie could not demonstrate that the blender had ever been sold or offered for sale at the strike-through price. Consequently, the two-price comparison did not reflect a genuine discount for consumers. Froothie incurred a penalty of $10,800 for this conduct. Kogan received three infringement notices and paid $32,400 in penalt...
Post a Comment
Read more